Lawmakers reintroduce REAL Meat Act to halt federal investment in cultivated meat

USA – A group of lawmakers has once again put forward the REAL Meat Act, this time with a focus on stopping federal investments in the cultivated meat industry.

In the House of Representatives, politicians have co-sponsored a bill that seeks to bar the US government from funding the development and promotion of cultivated meat products.

This renewed legislative effort, known as the Real Marketing Edible Artificials Truthfully Act – or the REAL Meat Act – has been spearheaded by Ohio Representative Warren Davidson.

The proposed law targets the burgeoning cultivated meat sector, highlighting concerns over federal support for these alternative proteins. 

Davidson has voiced strong opposition, claiming that lab-grown meat presents health risks and threatens the livelihoods of traditional ranchers, livestock farmers, and butchers. 

He called for congressional action to prevent taxpayer dollars from being spent on what he deems an “inferior, experimental product.”

Originally introduced in 2019 by Nebraska Senator Deb Fischer, the REAL Meat Act aimed to require plant-based meat labels to include the term “imitation” and clearly state the absence of real meat. 

Though Fischer’s initial bill and a companion bill introduced by Kansas’s Roger Marshall did not advance, Fischer reintroduced the legislation last year.

It has since been reviewed by the Senate and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.

Davidson’s reintroduced bill in the House, now under Republican control, is backed by eight other GOP lawmakers: Kevin Hern, Matt Rosendale, Greg Steube, Harriet Hageman, Jim Baird, Ronny Jackson, Thomas Massie, and Keith Self. 

Notably, the FDA and USDA approved cultivated meat for sale last year after extensive food safety evaluations.

In a related trend, Florida recently became the first state to ban the production and sale of cultivated meat, with Alabama following suit shortly thereafter.

Similar legislative proposals are being discussed in Arizona, Wisconsin, Texas, Nebraska, and Tennessee. 

While proponents of these bills argue they protect farmers, critics argue they primarily serve the interests of the industrial meat sector, which is resistant to the rise of environmentally friendlier alternatives like cultivated meat.

These alternatives offer significantly lower emissions, water usage, and land requirements compared to conventional meat, posing a potential solution to the severe impacts of climate change that threaten smallholder farmers.

Liked this article? Subscribe to Food Business Africa News, our regular email newsletters with the latest news insights from Africa and the World’s food and agro industry. HERE